Segment
1. Accelera Phi-R Lowcost2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Accelera Phi-R vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Accelera) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Accelera (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Phi-R and the Intensa UHP 2 were tested.
| # | Accelera Phi-R
| Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 13.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Accelera Phi-R | 38,5 | 44 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,3 | 38,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
