Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Accelera Phi-R Lowcost
Comparison: Accelera Phi-R vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Accelera) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Accelera (0%). But when it comes to comparing Accelera Phi-R and Falken Azenis FK510, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Accelera Phi-R was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Phi-R and the Azenis FK510 were tested.
| # | Accelera Phi-R
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Accelera Phi-R | 38,5 | 44 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 35,5 | 34,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
