Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Accelera Phi-R Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Accelera) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Accelera (0%). But when it comes to comparing Accelera Phi-R and Bridgestone Turanza T001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Accelera Phi-R was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Phi-R and the Turanza T001 were tested.
| # | Accelera Phi-R
| Bridgestone Turanza T001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Accelera Phi-R Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Accelera Phi-R | 38,5 | 44 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 | 36,2 | 34,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||