Looking for a comparison of Giti Gitisynergy H2 to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.
The Giti Gitisynergy H2 and the GT Radial Fe2 are two tyres that have been put to the test in various reviews and trials. Here, we will compare the two models to determine which is preferred according to the results and assessments.
The Giti Gitisynergy H2 is a summer tyre that, according to AutoBild's testing, ranks 17th out of 55. This model excels in secure wet handling and has short dry braking distances. Despite these merits, it does show a tendency to understeer on dry tracks, and it has a high rolling resistance. Nevertheless, the moderate price makes it an attractive option for many drivers. Check more about Giti Gitisynergy H2's manufacturer here.
Meanwhile, the GT Radial Fe2, a tyre designed for Ultra High Performance (UHP), did not fare as well in AutoBild's testing, ranking 19th out of 55. This tyre is good on dry road but it doesn't perform as well on wet surfaces. AutoBild noted that it has a non-balanced performance and certain weaknesses such as decreased mileage (which caused a downgrade) and a poor record in terms of environmental balance and sustainability. Despite these deficiencies, it scores well in efficiency. Here is the link to learn more about the production of GT Radial Fe2.
If we look at the ADAC test results, both tyres fell in the middle range with the Giti Gitisynergy H2 securing 29th place out of 50 and the GT Radial Fe2 coming up slightly higher at 22nd place.
In conclusion, the choice between the Giti Gitisynergy H2 and the GT Radial Fe2 will largely depend on the specific requirements of the consumer. The Giti Gitisynergy H2 is a dependable summer tyre with excellent wet handling and short dry braking distances but does have high rolling resistance. The GT Radial Fe2 falls short in terms of wet handling and environmental factors but shines in terms of dry road performance and efficiency. Therefore, users should consider their driving environment, priorities, and values when making a choice.
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Premium2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle3. Giti Gitisynergy H2 Lowcost4. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost5. Riken Road Performance Lowcost6. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Lowcost7. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Lowcost8. Nexen N blue HD plus Lowcost9. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
8. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
3. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
4. Gt Radial Fe2 16.55. Giti Gitisynergy H2 16.756. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.57. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary3. Gt Radial Fe2 Good4. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory5. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory6. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Satisfactory7. Nexen N blue HD plus Satisfactory8. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Sufficient
2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good3. Maxxis Mecotra 3 Satisfactory4. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory5. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory6. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Sufficient7. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Sufficient
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giti Gitisynergy H2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Giti Gitisynergy H2 | 36,6 | 29,8 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 | 37,4 | 29,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Giti Gitisynergy H2 Rating: Good | 2,8 | 3,4 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Riken Road Performance Rating: Poor | 3,1 | ||||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
