Looking for a comparison of Fulda EcoControl HP2 to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.
The Fulda EcoControl HP2 and Debica Presto HP2 are both summer tyres, designed for optimal performance in warm weather. Tested and rated by tyre test experts, these tyres have shown noteworthy strengths and weaknesses in various categories.
The EcoControl HP2 is a successor to the Fulda EcoControl HP tyre. It has been enhanced to offer better performance with our rating standing at 79%. According to the Autobild test, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 excelled in exterior noise reduction and cross Aquaplaning, managing to secure the 20th position out of 53 tyres tested. However, the test summary from autobild 2024 suggests that it demonstrated a few areas of concern including weaknesses on wet surfaces.
The Debica Presto HP2, on the other hand, doesn't have any previous model and its rated at a slightly higher percentage of 84%. It scored better in the Autobild test achieving the 16th position out of 53 tyres examined. This tyre stood out in price/value category. Autobild 2024 test summary indicates that the Debica Presto HP2 had weak points in terms of driving safety.
When comparing the positions of both tyres in the ADAC test, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 secured the 13th out of 50, while Debica Presto HP2 secured the 15th position.
In conclusion, the Debica Presto HP2 outperforms the Fulda EcoControl HP2 in terms of price/value and our rating. However, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 proves to be quieter and better in combating Aquaplaning. For more detailed review and features of these tyres, visit the respective manufacturers' websites at Fulda and Debica.
Ultimately, the best tyre would depend on individual driving needs. Drivers who prioritize low noise and aquaplaning resistance would be more inclined towards the Fulda EcoControl HP2 whereas those who value efficiency and good return on investment might choose Debica Presto HP2.
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium3. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Premium4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle6. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle7. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost8. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost9. Sava Intensa HP2 Lowcost
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.676. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.757. Debica Presto HP2 12.88. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.629. Sava Intensa HP2 18.25
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary3. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Highly recommended4. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended5. Michelin e.Primacy Very good7. Sava Intensa HP2 Good9. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended3. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory4. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory5. Sava Intensa HP2 Satisfactory6. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory7. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Conditionally recommended8. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient9. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB2. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,8 | 29,5 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 37,4 | 30,2 | |||||
| Sava Intensa HP2 | 37,2 | 30,0 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,9 | 27,7 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 | 36,3 | 28,4 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 37,4 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Good | 2,3 | ||||||
| Sava Intensa HP2 Rating: Good | 2,6 | 2,8 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,4 | |||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,0 | 33,8 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 36,3 | 31,9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa HP2 | 36,4 | 33,7 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,7 | 31,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
