Kumho Ecsta HS52

Strengths

Balanced performance with safe handling on both dry and wet roads.

Short braking distances in both dry and wet conditions.

Very good predicted durability with low tread wear.

Low fuel consumption and attractive price-performance ratio.

Quick steering response and strong cornering grip.

Weaknesses

Minor weaknesses in environmental impact and sustainability.

Slightly heavy tire weight.

Steering response can be slightly delayed in certain situations.

Comfort is average, with moderate road noise and rolling comfort.

Performance Analysis: Kumho Ecsta HS52

This graph shows how the tyre ranks across different properties compared to other tested tyres. Higher percentile means better performance - 100% means better than every tyre in every test, 0% means worse than every tyre in every test.

50%

Dry handling

Wet circle cornering

Dry braking

Wet braking

Interior noise

Wet handling

Comfort

Exterior noise

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Aquaplaning - cross

Loading comparison data...

Timeline

2022

Kumho Ecsta HS52 was launched and replaced Kumho Ecsta HS51.

2022

Kumho Ecsta HS52 was tested 2x (Autobild,...)

2023

Kumho Ecsta HS52 was tested 3x (ADAC,...)

2024

Kumho Ecsta HS52 was tested 4x (Autobild,...)

Sizes

Kumho Ecsta HS52 is made in 104 sizes, starting from 175/65 R14 up to 195/55 R20.

Filter:

XL 34

show prices

Similar tires

Ecsta HS52

3.45/5

R14 - R20

Price from:

PremiumContact 7

R16 - R21

4.85/5

Comparison with Kumho Ecsta HS52:

Continental better at:

• Wet handling
• Aquaplaning - cross
• Wet braking

Continental worse at:

• Exterior noise

Price from:

Compare

Turanza T005

R14 - R23

4.4/5

Comparison with Kumho Ecsta HS52:

Bridgestone better at:

• Aquaplaning - cross
• Wet handling
• Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone worse at:

• Exterior noise
• Comfort
• Dry handling

Price from:

Compare

Efficient Grip Performance 2

R15 - R20

3.9/5

Comparison with Kumho Ecsta HS52:

Goodyear better at:

• Comfort
• Aquaplaning - cross
• Exterior noise

Goodyear worse at:

• Dry braking
• Wet braking
• Dry handling

Price from:

Compare

Primacy 4+

R16 - R21

3.8/5

Comparison with Kumho Ecsta HS52:

Michelin better at:

• Aquaplaning - cross
• Exterior noise

Michelin worse at:

• Wet circle cornering
• Interior noise
• Dry handling

Price from:

Compare

Ventus Prime 4

R13 - R23

3.6/5

Comparison with Kumho Ecsta HS52:

Hankook better at:

• Exterior noise

Hankook worse at:

• Comfort
• Interior noise
• Wet circle cornering

Price from:

Compare

Proxes Comfort

R14 - R20

3.55/5

Comparison with Kumho Ecsta HS52:

Toyo better at:

• Exterior noise
• Aquaplaning - cross
• Comfort

Toyo worse at:

• Wet braking
• Wet circle cornering
• Dry handling

Price from:

Compare

ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

R14 - R22

3.35/5

Comparison with Kumho Ecsta HS52:

Falken better at:

• Aquaplaning - cross
• Aquaplaning - longitudal
• Comfort

Falken worse at:

• Interior noise
• Wet circle cornering
• Wet handling

Price from:

Compare

N Fera Primus

R15 - R19

3.25/5

Comparison with Kumho Ecsta HS52:

Nexen better at:

• Aquaplaning - cross
• Aquaplaning - longitudal
• Wet braking

Nexen worse at:

• Dry handling
• Dry braking
• Wet circle cornering

Price from:

Compare

Comparison: tyres similar to Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho Ecsta HS52 in tyre tests

All tyre tests where Kumho Ecsta HS52 was featured:

All tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Ranked #2 of 55

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	35,4	25,8
Kumho Ecsta HS52	35,4	26,1
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2024 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #5 of 20

Securing a commendable 5th place out of 20 participants, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 achieved a noteworthy final rating of 'Good.' This tire stood out for its impressive performance on both wet and dry surfaces, delivering short braking distances under these conditions, which directly contributed to its strong showing. It was particularly dominant in dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking disciplines, showcasing its superior engineering in these critical safety aspects. Despite these strengths, the tire did not go without critique; its ride comfort was described as moderate, suggesting room for improvement in this area. However, given its competitive pricing, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 offers a compelling value proposition for drivers looking for reliable performance without breaking the bank.

Name
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2024 215/55 R17
good
Ranked #3 of 16

In a highly competitive field, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 impressively finished 3rd among 16 competitors, earning an overall rating of 'Good'. This tire stands out for its balanced performance, having demonstrated safe and reliable behaviors on both dry and wet roads. Notably, on dry surfaces, it provides excellent steering feedback and a reassuring level of safety at the limit, along with a commendable short braking distance. Despite its slight weaknesses in aquaplaning resistance and a heavier tire weight, its performance on wet roads remains commendable, offering good grip and controllability along with strong braking and handling. However, it received only a satisfactory mark in aquaplaning situations. The tire also shined in terms of durability, showcasing very good predicted mileage and low wear, which contributes to its low fuel consumption, though its environmental performance was seen as satisfactory due to its higher weight and the sustainability aspect of its production received a limited rating. Specifically excelling in disciplines such as "mileage" and "Wet circle cornering," the Kumho Ecsta HS52 demonstrates its strengths in longevity and wet performance. Conversely, it ranked last in "Aquaplaning - longitudinal" and "Exterior noise," indicating areas for potential improvement. Despite these minor drawbacks, its strong overall performance marks it as a commendable choice for consumers looking for a reliable and durable summer tire.

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,6	1,7
Kumho Ecsta HS52	2,8	2,1
Show test details

Vibilagare Summer tyre test 2024 215/55 R17

Ranked #3 of 9

Name	Points total
Best values in test	87
Kumho Ecsta HS52	84
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #8 of 50

Finishing 8th out of 50 competitors, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 achieved a commendable distinction for its performance, earning a final rating of "Good." This tire displayed a well-rounded competence, delivering reliable results on both dry and wet roads. Its braking distances were marked as good compared to other participants, especially noting its proficiency on wet surfaces with strong grip and confident maneuverability. However, it did report minor setbacks, including slight deficiencies in its environmental footprint, efficiency, and sustainability aspects. While it scored well for its longevity and wear, the increased weight of the tire detracted from its efficiency rating. Moreover, sustainability was rated merely as satisfactory, primarily due to its production origin. Despite these areas for improvement, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 stood out for its safety on the road, confirming its solid standing among other contenders.

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	1,3	1,8
Kumho Ecsta HS52	2,7	2,3
Show test details

Source: www.adac.de

Tyre Reviews Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16
recommended
Ranked #8 of 13

Name
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Show test details

Autoklub ČR Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16

Ranked #13 of 19

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry
Best values in test	104,7	106	103,4
Kumho Ecsta HS52	96,9	94,3	99,5
Show test details

Source: www.autoklub.cz

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Ranked #3 of 51

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	35,7	27,5
Kumho Ecsta HS52	35,7	28,6
Show test details

Source: www.autobild.de

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17
good
Ranked #6 of 21

Securing a commendable third position out of a pool of 21 competitors, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 showcased an impressive performance. This tyre, cherished for its new summer tread profile, strikes a balance with its comprehensive performance capabilities. Noteworthy are its short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces, coupled with good comfort and a favorable cost-to-performance ratio. However, it's not without its drawbacks, as some delay in steering response was observed. Distinctly, it excelled outstandingly in dry braking, alongside being lauded for its price-to-value proposition, marking it as a strong contender in its category.