Table of contents:
245/40 R17 Falken Azenis FK510 variants
No
No
Falken Azenis FK510 is a summer tyre made in total of 112 sizes, ranging from R17 to R17 - this particular dimension is R17, which means it fits to a 17 inch/431.8mm diameter wheel. 245/40 R17 is 40mm wider than the narrowest dimension (205) and 50mm narrower than the widest one (295). This tyre profile of 40 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 40% of the tyre width (245mm), which results in 98mm sidewall height. In 245/40 R17, there is only one possible speed index for Falken Azenis FK510 - "Y", which is good for speeds up to 300 km/h.
245/40 R17 95 Y
| Shop | Product | Stock | Availability | Shipping | Price | Action |
|---|
245/40 R17 95 Y
| Shop | Product | Stock | Availability | Shipping | Price | Action |
|---|
Falken Azenis FK510 is made in 112 sizes, starting from 205/50 R17 up to 295/25 R22.
Similar tires
Falken Azenis FK510 in tyre tests
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (245/40 R17)
AutoMotorSport Summer tyre test 2022 245/45 R19
good
Ranked #8 of 10
The Falken Azenis FK510 finished 8th out of 10 competitors, securing a final rating of 'Good'. This tire displayed acceptable wet braking performance, alongside commendable grip in both wet and dry conditions. Notably, the soon-to-be-available successor, the Falken Azenis FK520, is anticipated by many. However, areas of improvement were identified, including a tendency for aquaplaning, a lack of balance during dry braking, responsiveness issues, and a decrease in safety during lane changes. These drawbacks suggest the tire is better suited for vehicles with less demanding dynamic needs. Moreover, it emerged as a cost-effective choice, particularly recommended for those prioritizing price without compromising on essential safety in wet conditions.
good
Ranked #8 of 10
The Falken Azenis FK510 finished 8th out of 10 competitors, securing a final rating of 'Good'. This tire displayed acceptable wet braking performance, alongside commendable grip in both wet and dry conditions. Notably, the soon-to-be-available successor, the Falken Azenis FK520, is anticipated by many. However, areas of improvement were identified, including a tendency for aquaplaning, a lack of balance during dry braking, responsiveness issues, and a decrease in safety during lane changes. These drawbacks suggest the tire is better suited for vehicles with less demanding dynamic needs. Moreover, it emerged as a cost-effective choice, particularly recommended for those prioritizing price without compromising on essential safety in wet conditions.
| Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,0 | 9,7 | 9,4 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 7,5 | 7,0 | 6,3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 245/40 R19
satisfactory
Ranked #9 of 10
The Falken Azenis FK510 secured the 9th spot among 10 competitors, receiving a final rating of 'Satisfactory.' This moderate dynamic summer tire showcased commendable resistance to aquaplaning and provided good riding comfort, distinguishing itself as the absolute best in the disciplines of aquaplaning-cross and comfort. However, it fell short in a few areas, notably characterized by its weak grip level and extended braking distances on wet surfaces. Additionally, a tendency towards oversteering was observed, indicating areas where improvements could be desirable. Despite these limitations, its strengths in specific conditions highlight its potential suitability for drivers prioritizing aquaplaning resistance and comfort.
satisfactory
Ranked #9 of 10
The Falken Azenis FK510 secured the 9th spot among 10 competitors, receiving a final rating of 'Satisfactory.' This moderate dynamic summer tire showcased commendable resistance to aquaplaning and provided good riding comfort, distinguishing itself as the absolute best in the disciplines of aquaplaning-cross and comfort. However, it fell short in a few areas, notably characterized by its weak grip level and extended braking distances on wet surfaces. Additionally, a tendency towards oversteering was observed, indicating areas where improvements could be desirable. Despite these limitations, its strengths in specific conditions highlight its potential suitability for drivers prioritizing aquaplaning resistance and comfort.
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 1- | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 1- | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | ||||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 8,0 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
