Table of contents:
205/55 R17 Apollo Alnac 4G variants
No
No
Special: XL
Apollo Alnac 4G is a summer tyre made in total of 46 sizes, ranging from R14 to R14 - this particular dimension is R17, which means it fits to a 17 inch/431.8mm diameter wheel. 205/55 R17 is 20mm wider than the narrowest dimension (185) and 10mm narrower than the widest one (215). This tyre profile of 55 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 55% of the tyre width (205mm), which results in 112.75mm sidewall height. In 205/55 R17, there is only one possible speed index for Apollo Alnac 4G - "V", which is good for speeds up to 240 km/h. In 205/55 R17, Alnac 4G usually competes against ZV7, which is a tyre from Avon with a rating of 17%, compared to 23% of the Apollo in question.
205/55 R17 95 V XL
| Shop | Product | Stock | Availability | Shipping | Price | Action |
|---|
Apollo Alnac 4G is made in 46 sizes, starting from 185/60 R14 up to 215/60 R17.
Similar tires
Apollo Alnac 4G in tyre tests
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (205/55 R17)
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 96,7 | 97,3 | 96,1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16
good
Ranked #27 of 50
Securing the 27th spot out of a group of 50 competitors, the Apollo Alnac 4G tire received a final rating of 'Good' but with several critical notes from the testers. Notably, its performance didn't impress on both dry and wet roads, leading to concerns regarding overall driving safety. The feedback from the steering was only satisfactory on dry surfaces, making it challenging for drivers to adjust the steering angle for corners immediately. Similarly, its handling at the limit and braking performance on dry roads were judged as satisfactory, though it managed to earn a 'good' rating in braking distance. Conditions on wet roads also did not highlight the tire's strengths; despite receiving a 'good' rating for its longitudinal aquaplaning behavior, its performance in lateral aquaplaning, wet braking, and handling fell into the satisfactory category. The grip level was described as mediocre, indicating fair but not exceptional, performance in managing longitudinal and lateral forces. Environmental performance and sustainability aspects also attracted criticism. The Apollo Alnac 4G was marked just satisfactory in environmental impact, mainly due to its relatively low predicted mileage which contributes negatively to its environmental rating. Furthermore, the wear it exhibits was also only satisfactory. On a positive note, its efficiency was praised due to lower weight and fuel consumption, securing a 'good' rating in this area. Nevertheless, the tire's sustainability, especially given its production in India, was rated as merely adequate. No specific attributes were identified as the absolute best or worst, indicating a performance that did not particularly stand out in any single discipline but instead showed a range of effectiveness and areas for improvement across various aspects of its performance and impact.
good
Ranked #27 of 50
Securing the 27th spot out of a group of 50 competitors, the Apollo Alnac 4G tire received a final rating of 'Good' but with several critical notes from the testers. Notably, its performance didn't impress on both dry and wet roads, leading to concerns regarding overall driving safety. The feedback from the steering was only satisfactory on dry surfaces, making it challenging for drivers to adjust the steering angle for corners immediately. Similarly, its handling at the limit and braking performance on dry roads were judged as satisfactory, though it managed to earn a 'good' rating in braking distance. Conditions on wet roads also did not highlight the tire's strengths; despite receiving a 'good' rating for its longitudinal aquaplaning behavior, its performance in lateral aquaplaning, wet braking, and handling fell into the satisfactory category. The grip level was described as mediocre, indicating fair but not exceptional, performance in managing longitudinal and lateral forces. Environmental performance and sustainability aspects also attracted criticism. The Apollo Alnac 4G was marked just satisfactory in environmental impact, mainly due to its relatively low predicted mileage which contributes negatively to its environmental rating. Furthermore, the wear it exhibits was also only satisfactory. On a positive note, its efficiency was praised due to lower weight and fuel consumption, securing a 'good' rating in this area. Nevertheless, the tire's sustainability, especially given its production in India, was rated as merely adequate. No specific attributes were identified as the absolute best or worst, indicating a performance that did not particularly stand out in any single discipline but instead showed a range of effectiveness and areas for improvement across various aspects of its performance and impact.
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | |||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,6 | 27 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 38,6 | 32,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
