Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Yokohama (58%). In this particular case, the Michelin Primacy 4+ has a better rating of 76% compared to 55% of the Yokohama BluEarth-XT. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth-XT was done in 2025, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin Primacy 4+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R18 test, where both the BluEarth-XT and the Primacy 4+ were tested. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the BluEarth-XT is made in Japan and Primacy 4+ is made in Spain.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth-XT
| Michelin Primacy 4+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium2. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Upper-middle
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Satisfactory
2. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Yokohama BluEarth-XT Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Michelin Primacy 4+ Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||