Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Yokohama (46%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 49% of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V906. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 was done in 2022, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the BluEarth winter V906 and the WinterCraft WP52+ were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ also have B wet ratings.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth winter V906
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory
2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 | 37.9 | 29.0 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ | 33.5 | 28.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||