Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle3. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost4. Riken Road Performance Lowcost5. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.54. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary3. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory3. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD plus | 38,3 | 40,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,7 | 34,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
