Segment
2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle3. Taurus Winter 601 Lowcost
Comparison: Taurus Winter 601 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Taurus Winter 601 42.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Taurus Winter 601 | 43,7 | - | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 36,6 | 29,5 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 34,9 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Taurus Winter 601 | 43,3 | - | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 34,7 | 28,3 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 35,9 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Taurus Winter 601 | 47,6 | - | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 42,6 | 29,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
