Segment
1. Superia Bluewin UHP Lowcost2. Radar Dimax Alpine Lowcost
Comparison: Superia Bluewin UHP vs. Radar Dimax Alpine
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Radar winter tyres are slightly better rated (31%) than Superia (0%). The first tyre test of Superia Bluewin UHP was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Radar Dimax Alpine first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Bluewin UHP and the Dimax Alpine were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Superia Bluewin UHP
| Radar Dimax Alpine
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Radar Dimax Alpine 25.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Radar Dimax Alpine Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Radar Dimax Alpine Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 45.7 | - | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 39.9 | 28.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 44,8 | ||||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 37,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
