Segment
2. Sava eskimo hp Lowcost
Comparison: Sava eskimo hp vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Sava (58%). But when it comes to comparing Sava eskimo hp and Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the eskimo hp and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Sava eskimo hp
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava eskimo hp 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Sava eskimo hp Rating: - | 3 | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: - | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Sava eskimo hp | 39,7 | 26,1 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 39,1 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
