Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium3. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle4. Sailun Atrezzo ZSR Lowcost5. Kenda KR41 Emera A1 Lowcost
Comparison: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Kenda KR41 Emera A1 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WetProof 5.643. Pirelli P ZERO 6.06
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended3. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended4. Kenda KR41 Emera A1 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Nokian WetProof Recommended3. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended4. Kenda KR41 Emera A1 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Sailun Atrezzo ZSR | 37,9 | 38,2 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 35,1 | 28,9 | |||||
| Nokian WetProof | 35,2 | 29,7 | |||||
| Kenda KR41 Emera A1 | 34,9 | 30,3 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 35,8 | 29,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
