Segment
1. Pirelli CARRIER Premium2. Nokian cLine VAN Upper-middle
Comparison: Pirelli CARRIER vs. Nokian cLine VAN
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Pirelli summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Pirelli CARRIER and Nokian cLine VAN, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the CARRIER and the cLine VAN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 48% of Pirelli CARRIER dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian cLine VAN also have A wet ratings.
| # | Pirelli CARRIER
| Nokian cLine VAN
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory2. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian cLine VAN Satisfactory2. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Pirelli CARRIER Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 1,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Nokian cLine VAN Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
