Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Kumho (58%). Important for this comparison is also the Sportauto 2015 235/35 R19 test, where both the zLine and the Ecsta PS91 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine has A wet grip rating, whereas 68% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B rating.
| # | Nokian zLine
| Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R18 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
2. Nokian zLine 20.
1. Nokian zLine 7.38
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian zLine 83%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
2. Nokian zLine 60%
1. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 75%
1. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 93%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,3 | 6 | 7,6 | 7 | |||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,4 | 8 | 8,4 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,5 | 6 | 8,8 | 7,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||