• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Kumho Ecsta PS91

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Kumho (58%). Important for this comparison is also the Sportauto 2015 235/35 R19 test, where both the zLine and the Ecsta PS91 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian zLine has A wet grip rating, whereas 68% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B rating.

# Nokian zLine
/0%
Kumho Ecsta PS91
/16%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Kumho
DimensionsR16 - R21 R18 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

1

Mutual tests

Sportauto
Name Points totalWetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,367,67
Nokian zLine
Rating: Recommended
8,28,488,4
Kumho Ecsta PS91
Rating: Conditionally recommended
7,56 8,87,3
Show test details