• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR SUV 3 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WR SUV 3 and the Blizzak LM-80 Evo were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo also have C wet ratings.

# Nokian WR SUV 3
/0%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
/0%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Bridgestone
DimensionsR15 - R21 R15 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autozeitung
Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test406147134143
Nokian WR SUV 3
Rating: Highly recommended
390131128131
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
Rating: -
35597123135
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-21-
Nokian WR SUV 3
Rating: -
2-2-2-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
Rating: -
33+2+
Show test details