Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 67% compared to 64% of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the WR Snowproof P and the Kristall Control HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (55%) of the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | ||||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.4 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 147 | 143 | 147 | ||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Recommended for economical driving | 84 | 143 | 129 | ||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 96 | 110 | 142 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,1 | 2,8 | 2,5 | |
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 3,2 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 3,7 | 2,5 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
