In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR A4 and Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the Winter Sottozero 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (60%) of the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 also have B wet ratings.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Winter
|
2020 | 245/45 R18 | View |
Nokian WR A4
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Nokian WR A4
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Nokian WR A4
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Nokian WR A4
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Nokian WR A4
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Nokian WR A4
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Nokian WR A4
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Nokian WR A4
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Nokian WR A4
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.