Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. BFGoodrich Advantage
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Powerproof and the Advantage were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof is made - Finland.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Summer
|
2022 | 215/55 R17 | View |
Performance comparison
Nokian Powerproof
BFGoodrich Advantage
Nokian Powerproof
BFGoodrich Advantage
Nokian Powerproof
BFGoodrich Advantage
Nokian Powerproof
BFGoodrich Advantage
Nokian Powerproof
BFGoodrich Advantage
Nokian Powerproof
BFGoodrich Advantage
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
