In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Nankang) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Switzerland (Esa-Tecar). Generally, Nankang winter tyres are slightly better rated (9%) than Esa-Tecar (0%). The first tyre test of Nankang Winter Activa SV-3 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Winter Activa SV-3 and the Super Grip 9 were tested.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2018 | 175/65 R14 | View |
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Nankang Winter Activa SV-3
Esa-Tecar Super Grip 9
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.