Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium2. Continental UltraContact NXT Premium
Comparison: Michelin Primacy 3 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Michelin (84%). The first tyre test of Michelin Primacy 3 was done in 2016, compared to 2025 when was the Continental UltraContact NXT first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Michelin Primacy 3 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Continental UltraContact NXT also have A wet ratings.
| # | Michelin Primacy 3
| Continental UltraContact NXT
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Exemplary2. Continental UltraContact NXT Test winner
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Primacy 3 71 dB
