Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 79% of Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 has A rating.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Pilot Sport CUP 2 Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
