• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 vs. Nokian WR A4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 has a better rating of 59% compared to 47% of the Nokian WR A4. The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the Nokian WR A4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the Pilot Alpin PA4 and the WR A4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 has C wet grip rating, whereas 94% of Nokian WR A4 has B rating.

# Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
/59%
Nokian WR A4
/47%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR17 - R21 R16 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-21-
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Good
22 2
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Not recommended
4+2- 2
Show test details
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-2+2+
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Exemplary
2+21-
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Satisfactory
3+22-
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,69,29,910
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Recommended
7,78,18,47,2
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Still recommended
6,39,2 7,110
Show test details