• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Michelin CrossClimate+ vs. Kumho Solus HA31

Table of contents:

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (55%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin CrossClimate+ and Kumho Solus HA31, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin CrossClimate+ was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the CrossClimate+ and the Solus HA31 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Michelin CrossClimate+ has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C rating.

# Michelin CrossClimate+
/0%
Kumho Solus HA31
/0%

Add to comparison

New comparison
Michelin
Kumho
DimensionsR13 - R19 R13 - R18
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Autobild Allyear tyre test 2019 225/45 R17
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+2+1
Michelin CrossClimate+
Rating: Exemplary		22+ 2+ 1
Kumho Solus HA31
Rating: Satisfactory		2-2+ 22+
Show test details
Autobild
Autobild Allyear tyre test 2019 225/45 R17
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,546,3
Michelin CrossClimate+39,948,6
Kumho Solus HA3143,849,5
Show test details