Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein allround tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Linglong (60%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Quatrac has a better rating of 92% compared to 61% of the Linglong Sport Master 4S. The first tyre test of Linglong Sport Master 4S was done in 2025, compared to 2020 when was the Vredestein Quatrac first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Sport Master 4S and the Quatrac were tested.
| # | Linglong Sport Master 4S
| Vredestein Quatrac
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Lowcost
1. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Satisfactory
1. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Linglong Sport Master 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||