Segment
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Linglong Green-Max All Season Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Linglong allround tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (55%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong Green-Max All Season and Kumho Solus HA31, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max All Season was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho Solus HA31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Green-Max All Season and the Solus HA31 were tested.
| # | Linglong Green-Max All Season
| Kumho Solus HA31
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Linglong Green-Max All Season Lowcost
1. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Linglong Green-Max All Season | 42,9 | 59,4 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||