Segment
1. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 vs. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Laufenn (31%). In this particular case, the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter has a better rating of 60% compared to 3% of the Laufenn i*Fit + LW31. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the i*Fit + LW31 and the Alnac 4G Winter were tested.
| # | Laufenn i*Fit + LW31
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 | 41.1 | - | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
