Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho WinterCraft WS71 and Nokian WR SUV 4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Offroad 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the WinterCraft WS71 and the WR SUV 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WS71 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Nokian WR SUV 4 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WS71
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 4 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Test winner | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||