Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Kumho (63%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho WinterCraft WP51 and Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the WinterCraft WP51 and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 also have C wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea and Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made in Korea.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 37,8 | 29,8 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Recommended | 2,8 | 2,7 | 3,2 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,3 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Recommended | 2,1 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,1 | ||||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 6,4 | ||||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Recommended | 8,0 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 38,8 | 28 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 34,9 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,4 | 2,6 | 2,4 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 41,0 | - | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 39,1 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||