Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Yokohama (42%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Ecsta PS71 and the Advan Sport V105 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 also have A wet ratings.
# | Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R23 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
Yokohama Advan Sport V105 | 35,3 | 34,7 | |||||
Show test details |