Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV Upper-middle2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV vs. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV has a better rating of 64% compared to 62% of the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV was done in 2025, compared to 2020 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (57%) of the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV also have A wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71 SUV
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended
