Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than Sava (43%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has a better rating of 81% compared to 75% of the Sava Intensa HP2. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the Sava Intensa HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ecsta HS52 and the Intensa HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Sava Intensa HP2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Sava Intensa HP2 Lowcost
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.672. Sava Intensa HP2 18.25
1. Sava Intensa HP2 Good2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Sava Intensa HP2 Satisfactory
1. Sava Intensa HP2 70 dB2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 ? dB
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
Sava Intensa HP2 | 37,2 | 30,0 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,3 | |||||
Sava Intensa HP2 Rating: Good | 2,6 | 2,8 | |||||
Show test details |