Segment
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Crugen HP71 vs. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (58%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 54% of Kumho Crugen HP71 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV has B rating.
| # | Kumho Crugen HP71
| Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Sufficient
