Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer UHP vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
The comparison of two prominent summer tyres, Kleber Dynaxer UHP and Sava Intensa UHP 2, reveals distinct strengths and weaknesses of each model. Produced by leading manufacturers Kleber and Sava, these tyres show variances in performance based on a rigorous set of tests.
The Kleber Dynaxer UHP rated at 48%, is noted for its exterior noise reduction and high mileage efficiency, with Autobild commending its quiet roll resistance. However, the tyre fared poorly under wet conditions, displaying mediocre grip and limited aquaplaning reserves. Despite its shortcomings, its position at number 15 in the Autobild test out of 53 models testifies to its overall quality.
On the other hand, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 maintaining a higher rating at 67%, surpasses its predecessor, the Sava Intensa UHP. Its primary strengths lie in its performance in aquaplaning and its solid price-to-value ratio. Short dry braking distances, low roll resistance and a competitive price point saw it grabbing the 17th position in the same Autobild test.
While both tyres offer distinct advantages, passive understeering and the limited aquaplaning reserves witnessed in testing situations limit the Sava Intensa UHP 2's total score. Similarly, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP's defection under wet conditions underscore its limitations.
To summarize, neither tyre stands out as the absolute winner. The Kleber Dynaxer UHP's high mileage efficiency and noise reduction are tempered by its underperformance in wet conditions. Consequently, it remains a solid choice for drivers in relatively dry climates. Comparatively, budget-conscious customers or those prioritizing dry traction might find the Sava Intensa UHP 2 more suitable despite its shortcomings. Deciding on the 'better' tyre ultimately depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the driver.
However, on a broader scope, based on overall proxies for quality, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 does edge out, albeit narrowly, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP, considering its overall better rating and performance in several test categories.
Performance comparison
Averaged from 2 tests
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
Sava Intensa UHP 2
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
Sava Intensa UHP 2
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
Sava Intensa UHP 2
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
Sava Intensa UHP 2
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
