Segment
1. Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 Lowcost2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Kenda (7%). In this particular case, the Debica Frigo HP2 has a better rating of 50% compared to 7% of the Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501. The first tyre test of Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Debica Frigo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Wintergen 2 KR501 and the Frigo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501
| Debica Frigo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 Lowcost2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
1. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | ||||||
| Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 | 38.8 | ||||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 38.1 | 28.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 | 40,9 | - | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,0 | 30,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 | 41,1 | ||||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||