Segment
1. Imperial Snowdragon 3 Lowcost2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Imperial (4%). The first tyre test of Imperial Snowdragon 3 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Debica Frigo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Snowdragon 3 and the Frigo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Imperial Snowdragon 3
| Debica Frigo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Imperial Snowdragon 3 Lowcost2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
1. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 3 | 42,3 | - | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,0 | 30,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 3 | 33,9 | 31,7 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||