Segment
2. Imperial Snowdragon 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial Snowdragon 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Imperial (0%). But when it comes to comparing Imperial Snowdragon 2 and Continental WinterContact TS 860, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Imperial Snowdragon 2 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 860 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowdragon 2 and the WinterContact TS 860 were tested.
| # | Imperial Snowdragon 2
| Continental WinterContact TS 860
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 2 | 46,8 | - | |||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 34,2 | 25,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
