Comparison: Imperial EcoDriver 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Imperial (0%). The first tyre test of Imperial EcoDriver 5 was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the EcoDriver 5 and the Ecsta HS52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autoklub ČR
|
Summer
|
2023 | 205/55 R16 | View |
Performance comparison
Imperial EcoDriver 5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Imperial EcoDriver 5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Imperial EcoDriver 5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Imperial EcoDriver 5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Imperial EcoDriver 5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Imperial EcoDriver 5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Imperial EcoDriver 5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
