Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Hankook (83%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 82% compared to 81% of the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3. The first tyre test of Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the W462 Winter i*cept RS3 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.
| # | Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 8 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 392 | ||||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Recommended | 369 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Test winner | 392 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2 | 2.1 | |||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 3.1 | 2.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 35,3 | 26,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | ||||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 98.9 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 99.7 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||