LM‑005 rules the rain; TS 870 P aces balance and efficiency.
Two philosophies, one goal: winter confidence. The Japanese-made Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 is the rain‑season maestro, tuned for razor-sharp control and short wet stops. Germany’s Continental WinterContact TS 870 P plays the long game with balanced winter abilities, crisp dry precision and standout efficiency. It’s a close duel across 17 mutual tests (LM-005 edges it 9–8), but they feel quite different on the road. If you associate Bridgestone with wet‑grip wizardry and Continental with rounded performance and low rolling resistance, you’re already halfway to the right choice.
Blizzak LM-005
WinterContact TS 870 P


Averaged from 10 tests
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 PThis is where the LM-005 earns its reputation. Across 2 measured wet braking tests, it averages 32.1 m versus 34.8 m for the TS 870 P, a clear advantage that you feel in everyday traffic and sudden stops. The Bridgestone’s tread design and compound generate tenacious wet grip, and its calm, precise reactions make it a standout in soaking corners. Aquaplaning resistance also tilts toward the Bridgestone, giving you extra margin through deep water at motorway speeds. The Continental is safe and predictable in the wet, but it typically stands a little later and can feel less locked‑down in heavy spray. If rain defines your winter, the Blizzak LM-005 is the specialist.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 POn cold, dry asphalt the TS 870 P is the more natural performer. Steering feels taut and linear, with strong lateral support and easy-to-place balance mid‑corner. That composure translates into confidence when you push on, and the “P” really does stand for performance. Pure dry braking can vary by size and surface, but the Continental often feels the more planted, especially during high-speed stops and lane changes. The LM-005 steers quickly and remains stable, yet several tests flagged it for needing a touch more runway in emergency dry stops versus the class leaders. If your winter is mostly cold and dry, the TS 870 P delivers the cleaner, sportier line.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 PIn snow, the gap narrows and sometimes flips. Averaged across 2 measured snow‑braking tests, the TS 870 P stops at 28.0 m versus 28.6 m for the LM‑005, a small but repeatable edge. The Continental also finds traction smoothly off the line and maintains corner grip with a reassuring, neutral balance. The Bridgestone can feel agile and quick to rotate on compacted snow, yet it’s more prone to gentle understeer on looser surfaces when you lean on it. Both are absolutely competent winter tyres—think of the TS 870 P as the steadier all‑rounder on wintry roads, while the LM‑005 is lively but not the last word in lateral hold on snow.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 PRefinement and efficiency favor Continental. The TS 870 P’s rolling resistance is notably low, which helps fuel economy and extends EV range; ride isolation is generally calm, with only sharp joints occasionally felt as a thump. Owners back this up: many praise its quietness, stable handling across surfaces and low wear, though some mention a high purchase price and mixed impressions on ice. The LM‑005 is no gas‑guzzler—its rolling resistance is commendably low for the category—but several tests point to quicker tread wear than newer designs. Noise levels for both are well controlled, yet the Continental usually sounds and feels slightly more hushed over distance.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 PChoose the Bridgestone Blizzak LM‑005 if wet roads dominate your winter and aquaplaning protection is non‑negotiable. Its short wet stops and surefooted rain handling are class highlights, and it remains engaging on mixed roads—just accept average snow lateral grip and potentially faster wear. Pick the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P if you want a balanced winter package with crisper dry handling, subtly better snow braking, and excellent efficiency—ideal for EVs and long‑distance commuters. It costs more, but its rounded poise and easy confidence make it a winter workhorse. If longevity is top priority, Continental’s recent wear results also look encouraging, while Bridgestone’s newer Blizzak 6 may address the LM‑005’s durability.
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild | Winter | 2022 | 215/55 R17 | View |
Autozeitung | Winter | 2024 | 215/55 R17 | View |
Autobild | Winter | 2023 | 225/40 R18 | View |
Sportauto | Winter | 2023 | 225/40 R18 | View |
Autobild | Winter | 2023 | 225/45 R18 | View |
Autobild | Winter | 2023 | 225/60 R18 | View |
AUTOBILD | Winter | 2024 | 235/35 R19 | View |
Autobild | Winter | 2022 | 245/40 R19 | View |
AutoMotorSport | Winter | 2022 | 245/45 R19 | View |
Automotorsport | Winter | 2023 | 255/45 R20 | View |
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5