18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P (2026)

10 mutual test(s) with detailed data

LM‑005 rules the rain; TS 870 P aces balance and efficiency.

Two philosophies, one goal: winter confidence. The Japanese-made Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 is the rain‑season maestro, tuned for razor-sharp control and short wet stops. Germany’s Continental WinterContact TS 870 P plays the long game with balanced winter abilities, crisp dry precision and standout efficiency. It’s a close duel across 17 mutual tests (LM-005 edges it 9–8), but they feel quite different on the road. If you associate Bridgestone with wet‑grip wizardry and Continental with rounded performance and low rolling resistance, you’re already halfway to the right choice.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Good for
Rain-heavy climates Confident high-speed wet driving Drivers prioritizing aquaplaning safety Sporty feel in the wet
Not ideal for
Drivers in heavy snow regions Mileage-focused owners Dry-grip purists Track day enthusiasts
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Good for
EV and hybrid owners Dry-road enthusiasts All-round winter balance Long-distance commuters
Not ideal for
Aquaplaning-prone routes Tight budgets Drivers prioritizing ultimate wet braking Ride-comfort perfectionists

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Number of tests
49
29
Best position
#1
#1
Average position
3.2
3.7
Latest test
2024
2025
Available sizes
244
222

Performance comparison

Averaged from 10 tests

Wet Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Wet Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Wet Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Wet Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Aquaplaning Cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
84%

This is where the LM-005 earns its reputation. Across 2 measured wet braking tests, it averages 32.1 m versus 34.8 m for the TS 870 P, a clear advantage that you feel in everyday traffic and sudden stops. The Bridgestone’s tread design and compound generate tenacious wet grip, and its calm, precise reactions make it a standout in soaking corners. Aquaplaning resistance also tilts toward the Bridgestone, giving you extra margin through deep water at motorway speeds. The Continental is safe and predictable in the wet, but it typically stands a little later and can feel less locked‑down in heavy spray. If rain defines your winter, the Blizzak LM-005 is the specialist.

Dry Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Dry Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Dry Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Dry Lane Change
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dry Steering Reaction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
90%

On cold, dry asphalt the TS 870 P is the more natural performer. Steering feels taut and linear, with strong lateral support and easy-to-place balance mid‑corner. That composure translates into confidence when you push on, and the “P” really does stand for performance. Pure dry braking can vary by size and surface, but the Continental often feels the more planted, especially during high-speed stops and lane changes. The LM-005 steers quickly and remains stable, yet several tests flagged it for needing a touch more runway in emergency dry stops versus the class leaders. If your winter is mostly cold and dry, the TS 870 P delivers the cleaner, sportier line.

Snow Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Snow Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Snow Traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Snow Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Snow Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%

In snow, the gap narrows and sometimes flips. Averaged across 2 measured snow‑braking tests, the TS 870 P stops at 28.0 m versus 28.6 m for the LM‑005, a small but repeatable edge. The Continental also finds traction smoothly off the line and maintains corner grip with a reassuring, neutral balance. The Bridgestone can feel agile and quick to rotate on compacted snow, yet it’s more prone to gentle understeer on looser surfaces when you lean on it. Both are absolutely competent winter tyres—think of the TS 870 P as the steadier all‑rounder on wintry roads, while the LM‑005 is lively but not the last word in lateral hold on snow.

Comfort & Noise
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Noise Exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Noise Interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
90%
Ride Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
69%

Refinement and efficiency favor Continental. The TS 870 P’s rolling resistance is notably low, which helps fuel economy and extends EV range; ride isolation is generally calm, with only sharp joints occasionally felt as a thump. Owners back this up: many praise its quietness, stable handling across surfaces and low wear, though some mention a high purchase price and mixed impressions on ice. The LM‑005 is no gas‑guzzler—its rolling resistance is commendably low for the category—but several tests point to quicker tread wear than newer designs. Noise levels for both are well controlled, yet the Continental usually sounds and feels slightly more hushed over distance.

Economy
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
70%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Rolling Resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
93%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
55%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
56%

Performance spider chart

Tread pattern comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Verdict

Choose the Bridgestone Blizzak LM‑005 if wet roads dominate your winter and aquaplaning protection is non‑negotiable. Its short wet stops and surefooted rain handling are class highlights, and it remains engaging on mixed roads—just accept average snow lateral grip and potentially faster wear. Pick the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P if you want a balanced winter package with crisper dry handling, subtly better snow braking, and excellent efficiency—ideal for EVs and long‑distance commuters. It costs more, but its rounded poise and easy confidence make it a winter workhorse. If longevity is top priority, Continental’s recent wear results also look encouraging, while Bridgestone’s newer Blizzak 6 may address the LM‑005’s durability.

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View
AutozeitungAutozeitung
Winter
2024215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2023225/40 R18View
SportautoSportauto
Winter
2023225/40 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2023225/45 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2023225/60 R18View
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Winter
2024235/35 R19View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022245/40 R19View
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Winter
2022245/45 R19View
AutomotorsportAutomotorsport
Winter
2023255/45 R20View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.