Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 SUV K125A vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (60%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 SUV K125A has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B rating.
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime3 SUV K125A
| Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
