Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Hankook (80%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has a better rating of 72% compared to 71% of the Michelin e.Primacy. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime 4 was done in 2022, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin e.Primacy first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ventus Prime 4 and the e.Primacy were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 53% of Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin e.Primacy has B rating.
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Michelin e.Primacy
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R23 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Michelin e.Primacy Very good
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,4 | |||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||