Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium2. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Kumho (58%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 and Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kinergy Eco K425 and the EcowinG ES01 KH27 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 55% of Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (78%) of the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | ||
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
