• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO vs. Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 vs. Nexen N Blue 4 Season

# Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
/87%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
/88%
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
/90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
/91%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
/79%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
/0%
Continental AllSeasonContact
/58%
Falken EuroALL Season AS210
/48%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
/0%

Add to comparison

Hankook
Continental
Bridgestone
Michelin
GoodYear
Bridgestone
Continental
Falken
Nexen
DimensionsR14 - R20 R15 - R22 R16 - R21 R15 - R21 R14 - R21 R15 - R21 R13 - R20 R13 - R20 R13 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

In the arena of all-season tyres, two prominent competitors - Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 and Continental AllSeasonContact 2 - have proven their mettle. Crafted by South Korea-based manufacturer Hankook and Czech Republic-based maker Continental respectively, these tyres feature major strengths with minor areas of improvement.


The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 stands as the successor to the Hankook Kinergy 4S model, bringing additional advancements on board. This tyre secured a laudable second position in the SportAuto test, proving its superiority over numerous competitors. Its standout features include commendable behaviour in aquaplaning situations, as observed in the Autobild test. However, it stands at the eighth position in terms of total tyres in this particular test. From a performance viewpoint, it exhibits reliable traction on snow and ice, sharp steering response, and a remarkable mileage. The only drawbacks are slightly prolonged braking distances on wet and dry tracks.


On the other hand, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has also made its presence felt in this segment. It boasts an impressive seal of approval with a first position in the SportAuto test. Moreover, this model secured the second position in the Autobild test, where it was praised for its low exterior noise, great snow-handling characteristics, and excellent wet braking qualities. In terms of performance, it is a versatile tyre that displays convincing winter qualities, dynamic handling, short braking distances on wet roads, low rolling noise, and high mileage. However, it does exhibit a slight tendency towards understeering.


Looking at the test results and performance analysis, both tyres hold their ground well, but with a higher overall score of 89% versus 85% and better performance in mutual tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 edges past the Continental AllSeasonContact 2, making it the better overall tyre in this comparison.

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

3

Mutual tests

SPORTAUTO
Name WetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in test9.58.910.010.0
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Very good
9.5 8.210.0 8.9
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Rating: Outstanding
8.88.9 9.210.0
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Rating: Very good
8.78.9 8.97.7
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Rating: Good
7.88.79.28.0
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rating: Good
7.88.38.59.4
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test37.745
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H75041.349.5
Continental AllSeasonContact 240.445.4
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 638.545
Michelin CrossClimate 237.7 47
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-341.848.3
Show test details
Autobild
Name
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Rating: Good
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Rating: Exemplary
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Rating: Exemplary
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Rating: Exemplary
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rating: Good
Show test details