Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than GT (50%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 82% compared to 39% of the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP. The first tyre test of GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Radial Champiro WinterPro HP and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Satisfactory
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 31,4 | 30,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP | 38,3 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||