Comparison: GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2

All-season tyre comparison: GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2. This concise review summarises independent test results, highlights strengths and weaknesses and explains which tyre comes out ahead overall.

Quick facts: the editorial ratings on our site give the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 a score of 88% and the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 81%. Neither model has been replaced by a newer generation at the time of these tests.

Test position overview

• Continental frequently places in the top ranks (multiple 1st–3rd placings across AutoBild, AUTOBILD, ACE, SPORTAUTO and others).


• GoodYear is consistently strong but usually sits a bit lower (typical placements around 3rd–6th), with some wins in individual tests (notably Autozeitung).

Where Continental AllSeasonContact 2 excels

• Wet and winter performance: multiple tests list excellent wet braking and handling plus very good snow traction and handling — a clear advantage in mixed, wet and cold climates.


• Noise and comfort: praised for low exterior noise and comfort in several reports.


• Rolling resistance and fuel economy: rated well for low rolling resistance, contributing to efficiency.


• Durability: tests note high mileage performance and generally strong wear characteristics.

Continental weaknesses: the most consistent concern is a higher price point — several test notes call it one of the more expensive options — and in a few tests there are mild signs of limited aquaplaning reserves or a tendency toward understeer in extreme situations.

Where Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 stands out

• Balanced performance: described repeatedly as a well-rounded tyre with good safety reserves across conditions.


• Snow traction: strong winter credentials with short braking distances on snow in multiple reports.


• Low rolling resistance: also noted for fuel-efficiency benefits.


• Aquaplaning and stability: several tests highlight good aquaplaning resistance (longitudinal especially) and confident handling.

GoodYear weaknesses: some tests flag slightly longer dry and wet braking distances versus the top-ranked Continental, and an average projected mileage in a few assessments. In side-by-side comparisons GoodYear often loses a little ground in the wet and in outright braking performance.

Head-to-head verdict
Across the combined test results, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is the overall stronger performer: it appears more often among the top three and scores higher for wet braking, comfort, rolling resistance and long-term wear. The GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 is an excellent, balanced all-rounder with notable snow performance and good aquaplaning resistance, making it a very sensible choice where value and consistent all-weather behaviour are priorities.

Recommendation: choose the Continental if you prioritise best-in-class wet and winter stopping, low noise and top-ranked test placings and are willing to pay a premium. Choose the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 if you want a dependable, fuel-efficient all-round tyre with excellent snow grip at a slightly lower overall test ranking.

Links: GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | Continental AllSeasonContact 2.