Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Goodride SA37 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride SA37 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Goodride (39%). The first tyre test of Goodride SA37 was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Tyre Reviews 2022 255/35 R19 test, where both the SA37 and the Ecsta PS71 were tested.
| # | Goodride SA37
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
2. Goodride SA37 69%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Goodride SA37 75%
Wet braking
2. Goodride SA37 63%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Goodride SA37 94%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Goodride SA37 72%
Dry handling
1. Goodride SA37 86%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Goodride SA37 91%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Goodride SA37 100%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Goodride SA37 | 1 | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
