Segment
1. Giti GitiWinter W1 Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost3. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti GitiWinter W1 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Debica Frigo HP2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.472. Giti GitiWinter W1 15.563. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory3. Giti GitiWinter W1 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Giti GitiWinter W1 Still recommended3. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 38,4 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 37,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W1 | 35,2 | 25,4 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,3 | 25,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 1,8 |
| Giti GitiWinter W1 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 3,4 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | |||||||
